I was at Durham University from 2007-2015, where I studied for a BA in Philosophy and Theology followed by an MA and PhD in Theology and Religion. My supervisors were Professors Chris Insole and Mark McIntosh. My thesis, ‘A Defence of Theological Virtue Ethics’, is available via Durham etheses. It forms the basis for my book of the same name, forthcoming in Bloomsbury Studies in Philosophy of Religion.
After that, I moved to the University of Notre Dame (USA) as a postdoctoral scholar with the Center for Theology, Science and Human Flourishing. I was part of a team of theologians and anthropologists led by Professors Agustín Fuentes and Celia Deane-Drummond. My research here focused on moral development in the context of human evolution.
In 2017 I joined the St. Andrews Science-Engaged Theology project as one of a team of postdoctoral scholars located at different universities in Europe and the USA. I was based at the University of Leeds, where I worked with Professor Mark Wynn on theological and scientific accounts of emotion and rational agency. This is a project which continues in my current research.
In 2018 I joined the University of Winchester, where I am a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Philosophy, Religions and Liberal Arts. I teach in Winchester’s Institute for Value Studies and in Theology.
A great deal of philosophical and especially theological thought about human nature holds that we are rational creatures. Great thinkers such as Aquinas and Kant treat reason as central not just to our own nature and actions but also to our relationship with God and the rest of creation. Philosophical critiques and recent research in psychology and neuroscience appears to cast doubt on this, suggesting that our apparent rationality is a ‘veneer’ that hides the unconscious processes and emotional or situational pressures which truly lie behind our judgements and actions.
My work seeks to engage with the philosophy and science of moral action to show that this apparent conflict is nothing of the sort. Philosophical, theological and scientific investigation each provide valuable and often mutually supporting insights into our moral natures. Together they suggest that our rational agency is not at odds with emotion or instinct - in fact it may even depend on them.